A total of 248 analyzable patients with Stages III-IV ovarian epithelial cancer (114 with and 134 without prior chemotherapy) were randomized to one of four cisplatin (DDP)-hexamethylmelamine (HMM) regimens. In each, HMM, 200 mg/m2 was given orally daily on days 8-21 of each 21-day cycle. DDP was given i.v. on Day 1 at a dose of 37.5 mg/m2 (regimens A and B) or 75 mg/m2 (regimens C and D). In addition, since pyridoxine administration has been reported to reduce the neurotoxicity of HMM, that agent was given at a dose of 300 mg/m2 orally on Days 1-21 in regimens B and D. Randomization was stratified for performance status (0-1, 2-3) and largest tumor diameter at entry (greater than 2- less than or equal to 10 cm, greater than 10 cm) for previously untreated patients, and for performance status and time from initial diagnosis to entry on study (less than or equal to 1 year, greater than 1 year) for previously treated patients. The overall response rate (PR + CR) was 54%, with 25% of patients achieving a complete response. The 61% response rate with the higher dose DDP regimens was significantly greater than the 47% response rate with the lower dose regimens (p = 0.031). Multivariate analysis identified higher DDP dose, age less than 60 years, no prior chemotherapy, small tumor bulk and favorable tumor grade as sig

With the use of combination chemotherapy as well as a wide range of symptomatic therapies (e.g. analgesics and antiemetics) for the treatment of patients with cancer, the field of oncology practises polypharmacy to an extreme degree. The risk for a drug interaction under these conditions is high, and the pharmacological characteristics of the anti-cancer drugs, such as steep dose-response curves, low therapeutic indices and severe toxicities, suggest that even small changes in the pharmacokinetic profile of the affected drug could significantly alter its toxicity or efficacy. In this review, drug interactions which quantitatively affect the absorption, distribution, biotransformation or excretion of the commonly used anticancer drugs are described. Most of the significant drug interactions involving this class of drugs occur at the level of biotransformation and excretion. For example, the renal excretion of methotrexate by glomerular filtration and tubular secretion is affected by a number of weak organic acids, such as probenecid, salicylates and penicillin, which compete for tubular secretion, resulting in delayed clearance of methotrexate. The best described example of an interaction at the level of biotransformation is the effect of allopurinol on the catabolism of 6-mercaptopurine. By inhibiting xanthine oxidase, allopurinol blocks the first-pass metabolism of 6-mercaptopurine following its oral administration, leading to a 4- to 5-fold increase in plasma concentrations. Known drug interactions may potentially be used to enhance the antitumour activity of a drug--for instance, the administration of tetrahydrouridine (a cytidine deaminase inhibitor) with cytarabine in an attempt to block its rapid inactivation to uridine arabinoside. Overall, little information is available concerning the pharmacokinetic interactions of anticancer drugs with each other and with other classes of drugs in man, in part because the high incidence of toxicity and treatment failure, and empirical dosing methods, obscure the recognition of possible interactions. Awareness on the part of the clinician and more extensive pharmacokinetic investigation will be needed to recognise, document and avoid potentially harmful pharmacokinetic drug interactions involving this class of drugs