Interaction between metronidazole (Flagyl) and warfarin had been suggested based on the disulfiram-like effect of metronidazole and the known interaction of warfarin and disulfiram. This case report confirms that this interaction is clinically significant in man

BACKGROUND: Despite the risk of hemorrhage, warfarin is the most commonly used oral anticoagulant today, both as monotherapy and when taken in combination with selected drugs. Warfarin is used most commonly for irregular heartbeat, after a heart attack, and after joint or heart valve replacement surgery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative risk of hemorrhage in health plan members who received warfarin concomitant with a drug known to cause an interaction or after diagnosis of liver disease or heart failure (HF). METHODS: A cohort study sample was drawn from an administrative database comprising medical and pharmacy claims for 1.7 million health plan members. A health plan member was defined as anyone who was eligible for pharmacy and medical benefits at any time from October 1, 2003, to September 30, 2004. To be included in the study, a member must have received at least 1 pharmacy claim for warfarin during the study period and been younger than 100 years. Hemorrhage was defined as a diagnosed bleeding episode recorded on a medical claim within 7 calendar days of a fill date for a pharmacy claim (new or refill) for warfarin. The following variables were used to predict the outcome measures: type of drug-drug or drug-disease interaction, patient age and gender, number of unique prescribers during the year for all drugs, specialty of the first prescriber for warfarin, average dose of warfarin, and days of warfarin therapy. Because individuals were followed only during the calendar year under study, the authors have interpreted the days of therapy measured primarily as a control on exposure. The outcome measures are prevalence of drug and disease interactions among members receiving warfarin therapy and the per-patient-per-year and per-member-per-month (PMPM) cost of medical treatment of hemorrhage associated with warfarin therapy including drug and disease interactions. Costs are defined as the total paid amount for a procedure or service after negotiated provider discounts and subtraction of patient copay and deductibles. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relative risk of hemorrhage in users of warfarin monotherapy and of warfarin users with drug-drug and drug-disease interactions. The comparison group in the logistic regression comprised the members who were not diagnosed with either HF or liver disease and who received warfarin therapy but none of the drugs under study known to cause drug interactions. Therefore, the odds ratios [ORs] produced were estimates of the relative risk of hemorrhage when taking warfarin concomitant with selected drugs and diseases. RESULTS: Of the 17,895 patients who used warfarin during the study year, 2,634 (14.7%) were diagnosed with a hemorrhage event within 1 week after filling a prescription for warfarin. The factors associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage included female gender (OR 1.149; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.053- 1.253), liver disease (OR 1.764; 95% CI, 1.360-2.288), and HF (OR 1.559; 95% CI, 1.373-1.770). Compared with the use of warfarin alone, the use of either cephalosporins (OR 1.157; 95% CI, 1.043-1.285) or metronidazole (OR 1.578; 95% CI, 1.321-1.886) was associated with increased risk of hemorrhage, whereas the risk of hemorrhage was not greater for concomitant use of warfarin with amiodarone, fibric acid derivatives, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors. There was no relationship between estimated average daily warfarin dose and prevalence of hemorrhage. Other variables associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage were increased patient age, female gender, 120 days or more of warfarin therapy during the year, 2 or more unique prescriber numbers, and the medical specialty of the first prescriber of warfarin. Over the population of 1.7 million members, the cost for all hemorrhage events within 7 days of a pharmacy claim for warfarin was 0.40 dollars PMPM. CONCLUSIONS: Only 2 of 5 combinations of warfarin with drugs in this study were found to be associated with a higher prevalence of hemorrhage compared with warfarin use alone. The absolute prevalence of hemorrhage in users of warfarin and metronidazole was 22.7% and 17.2% for warfarin and cephalosporins, respectively, versus 14.2% in users of warfarin alone. The prevalence of hemorrhage for concomitant use of warfarin and NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors, amiodarone, or fibric acid derivatives such as fenofibrate was not greater than for warfarin alone. Liver disease or HF in warfarin users was associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of hemorrhage

There are numerous drugs reported to interact with warfarin sodium. Reported drug interactions include decreased warfarin absorption, decreased vitamin K absorption, warfarin displacement from plasma protein binding sites, enhanced warfarin liver metabolism, and inhibition of warfarin liver metabolism. We would like to report a possible case of interaction between warfarin and metronidazole.

Coumarin derivatives combine 3 unfavorable properties which make them prone to potentially life threatening drug-drug interactions: (i) high protein binding; (ii) cytochrome P450 dependent metabolism; and (iii) a narrow therapeutic range. An entire list of drugs which are supposed to interact with coumarins (mostly with warfarin) comprises about 250 different compounds. Noteworthy are the interactions with cardiovascular or antilipidaemic drugs which are often coadministered with coumarins: amiodarone, propafenone and fibrates. Cardiovascular drugs which are obviously devoid or proven to be devoid of an interaction are angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, calcium antagonists, beta-blockers and cardiac glycosides. There are several other drugs which enhance the hypoprothrombinaemic response to coumarins by various mechanisms: inhibitors of the elimination of the eutomer S-(-)-warfarin (e.g. miconazole, phenylbutazone), combined with protein binding displacement (e.g., sulfinpyrazone, phenylbutazone), synergistic hypoprothrombinaemia (e.g. cefazoline). Furthermore, bleeding complications may occur with drugs affecting platelet function [aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and several nonsteroidal anti- inflammatories (NSAIDs)]. Strong inducers of coumarin metabolism are rifampicin (rifampin) and carbamazepine. Biphasic interactions may occur where a drug first enhances the hypoprothrombinaemic response to a coumarin but has a sustained inducing effect on coumarin metabolism (e.g. phenytoin or sulfinpyrazone). The complex response of coumarins to concomitant drug therapy makes it difficult to predict the occurrence and degree of a deterioration of anticoagulant control in individual patients. For clinical practice, it seems advisable that one should monitor for changes in prothrombin time when adding or deleting any newly approved drug or any drug suspected (e.g. on the basis of this review) to cause an interaction to patients on coumarin therapy. The onset of the adverse prothrombin time response might be from between 1 to 2 days up to 3 weeks (in case of phenprocoumon) after starting a concomitant drug regimen. With amiodarone, an adverse prothrombin time response might occur up to 2 months after initiating therapy. For heparins, only a drug interaction with aspirin or nitroglycerin seems clinically relevant due to the possibility of coadministration during acute cardiac events. Both drugs are shown to enhance the activated partial thromboplastin time response to heparin

Although drug interactions with warfarin are an important cause of excessive anticoagulation, their impact on the risk of serious bleeding is unknown. We therefore performed a cohort study and a nested case-control analysis to determine the risk of serious bleeding in 4152 patients (aged 40-84 years) with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) taking long-term warfarin (> 3 months).The study population was drawn from the UK General Practice Research Database. More than half (58%) of eligible patients used potentially interacting drugs during continuous warfarin treatment. Among 45 identified cases of incident idiopathic bleeds (resulting in hospitalisation within 30 days or death within 7 days) and 143 matched controls, more cases than controls took > or = 1 potentially interacting drug within the preceding 30 days (62.2% vs. 35.7%) and used > 4 drugs (polypharmacy) within the preceding 90 days (80.0% vs. 66.4%). Conditional logistic regression analysis yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 3.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4-8.5) for the risk of serious bleeding in patients treated with warfarin and > or = 1 drugs potentially increasing the effect of warfarin vs. warfarin alone adjusted for polypharmacy, diabetes, hypertension, heart failure, and thyroid disease; the adjusted OR for the combined use of warfarin and aspirin vs. warfarin alone was 4.5 (95% CI: 1.1-18.1). We conclude that concurrent use of potentially interacting drugs with warfarin is associated with a 3 to 4.5-fold increased risk of serious bleeding in long-term warfarin users

PURPOSE: A failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) was conducted to analyze the clinical and operational processes leading to above-target International Normalized Ratios (INRs) in warfarin-treated patients receiving concurrent antimicrobial therapy. METHODS: The INRs of patients on long-term warfarin therapy who received a course of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, metronidazole, fluconazole, miconazole, or voriconazole (highly potentiating antimicrobials, or HPAs) between September 1 and December 31, 2011, were compared with patients on long-term warfarin therapy who did not receive any antimicrobial during the same period. A multidisciplinary team of physicians, pharmacists, and a systems analyst was then formed to complete a step-by-step outline of the processes involved in warfarin management and concomitant HPA therapy, followed by an FMEA. RESULTS: Patients taking trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, metronidazole, or fluconazole demonstrated a significantly increased risk of having an INR of >4.5. The FMEA identified 134 failure modes. The most common failure modes were as follows: (1) electronic medical records did not identify all patients receiving warfarin, (2) HPA prescribers were unaware of recommended warfarin therapy when HPAs were prescribed, (3) HPA prescribers were unaware that a patient was taking warfarin and that the drug interaction is significant, and (4) warfarin managers were unaware that an HPA had been prescribed for a patient. CONCLUSION: An FMEA determined that the risk of adverse events caused by concomitantly administering warfarin and HPAs can be decreased by preemptively identifying patients receiving warfarin, having a care process in place, alerting providers about the patient's risk status, and notifying providers at the anticoagulation clinic

Drug metabolic interactions present potential risks in patient care, but their frequency and relative importance as a clinical problem remains unclear. To assess the frequency and clinical outcome of potentially harmful drug metabolic interactions in hospitalized patients, the authors performed a survey of the medication data of patients treated on internal and pulmonary medicine wards in a university hospital. The database was searched for concomitantly administered drug pairs that would, according to Hansten and Horn´s drug interaction database, carry a high risk for a clinically harmful metabolic drug interaction. Coadministrations involving warfarin or cisapride were subjected to further analysis regarding clinical outcome. A total of 142 patients were exposed to 150 interactions with potentially harmful clinical outcome, resulting in a frequency of 0.9% (95% CI 0.7% to 1.0%). Inhibition of warfarin metabolism by metronidazole produced significant overanticoagulation as evidenced by elevated international normalized ratio values, whereas inducers (rifampicin and phenobarbital) of warfarin metabolism significantly reduced the efficacy of warfarin. One case of minor bleeding and one case of clavicular vein thrombosis were detected as possible consequences of disturbed anticoagulation. The coadministration of cisapride and erythromycin significantly prolonged the corrected QT (QTc) interval and was associated with clinical symptoms of cardiac arrhythmias. Coadministration of cisapride with fluconazole or miconazole was not associated with prolongation of the QTc interval or cardiac sequelae. Evaluations of patient materials are needed to assess the clinical relevance of metabolic drug interactions

Background: It has been >25 years since the interaction between warfarin and metronidazole was last reported in the literature. The current case report represents the first documentation of this interaction associated with intracerebral hemorrhage. Case summary: We present a case of a 78-year-old white woman started on metronidazole (250 mg every 8 hours for 5 days) and levofloxacin (500 mg QD for 6 days) for an upper respiratory tract infection after visiting a walk-in clinic. The patient did not notify any of the health care professionals involved that she was on concomitant warfarin therapy, which had been stable over the last 3 months. Her warfarin dose was 7 mg daily, and her most recent international normalized ratio (INR) reading was 2.5. Nine days after her clinic visit, the patient was admitted to the hospital for a profuse nosebleed with an INR of 8.0 and was found to have an intraparenchymal hemorrhage of the left occipital lobe. The Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale indicated that the association with metronidazole was probable and the association with levofloxacin was possible (scores of 7 and 4, respectively). After a 1-week hospital stay, she was discharged. Conclusions: This adverse event is highly suggestive of a drug interaction caused primarily by metronidazole, which produces an increase in S-warfarin concentrations. Treatment provided by health care providers who were not familiar with the patient and the use of a different pharmacy (where the pharmacist was unaware of her current medications) likely contributed to the event. copyright 2008 Excerpta Medica Inc

Interaction between metronidazole and warfarin is thought to potentiate the anticoagulant effect of warfarin. In this article, the authors propose mechanisms for this interaction, based on three case studies

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the population impact of previously reported interactions between warfarin and other drugs on international normalized ratio (INR) levels. METHODS: Using The Health Improvement Network (THIN), a United Kingdom primary care database, a cohort of warfarin users between 2005 and 2013 (N = 121,962) was followed until the first qualifying prescription for the potential interacting drugs was evaluated. Sixteen sub-cohorts, one for each study drug, and a control sub-cohort of warfarin were ascertained. Short-term changes in INR levels were assessed by comparing INR values measured before and after initiation of the interacting drug with paired Student's t-test. We also evaluated the proportion of patients with INR values outside the therapeutic range (INR: 2-3). RESULTS: Miconazole use was associated with the highest mean increase in INR (+3.35), followed by amiodarone (+1.28), fluconazole (+0.79), metronidazole (+0.75) and nystatin (+0.65). After subtracting the natural INR variation observed in the control sub-cohort, supra-therapeutic levels (INR > 3) were found in 53.2% (miconazole), 45.5% (amiodarone), 23.3% (metronidazole), 23.2% (fluconazole) and 17.6% (nystatin) of patients initiating treatment with these drugs. Carbamazepine use was associated with a mean INR decrease of -0.63 and infra-therapeutic levels (INR < 2) were observed in 46.2% of patients initiating carbamazepine. For all other drugs, the change was small to moderate, in absolute INR units (+0.23 to +0.55) and in the proportion of patients with INR levels out of therapeutic range (<16%). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically potentially important interactions were observed in several study drugs. The majority of them, although confirmed, had little impact after adjusting for standard INR variability in the general population of warfarin users

Background Antibiotics may interact with warfarin, increasing the risk for significant bleeding events. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of veterans who were prescribed warfarin for 30 days without interruption through the US Department of Veterans Affairs between October 1, 2002 and September 1, 2008. Antibiotics considered to be high risk for interaction with warfarin include: trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, metronidazole, fluconazole, azithromycin, and clarithromycin. Low-risk antibiotics include clindamycin and cephalexin. Risk of bleeding event within 30 days of antibiotic exposure was measured using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusted for demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and receipt of other medications interacting with warfarin. Results A total of 22,272 patients met inclusion criteria, with 14,078 and 8194 receiving high- and low-risk antibiotics, respectively. There were 93 and 36 bleeding events in the high- and low-risk groups, respectively. Receipt of a high-risk antibiotic (hazard ratio [HR] 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-2.19) and azithromycin (HR 1.93; 95% CI, 1.13-3.30) were associated with increased risk of bleeding as a primary diagnosis. TMP/SMX (HR 2.09; 95% CI, 1.45-3.02), ciprofloxacin (HR 1.87; 95% CI, 1.42-2.50), levofloxacin (HR 1.77; 95% CI, 1.22-2.50), azithromycin (HR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.16-2.33), and clarithromycin (HR 2.40; 95% CI, 1.16-4.94) were associated with serious bleeding as a primary or secondary diagnosis. International normalized ratio (INR) alterations were common; 9.7% of patients prescribed fluconazole had INR value >6. Patients who had INR performed within 3-14 days of co-prescription were at a decreased risk of serious bleeding (HR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.88). Conclusions Warfarin users who are prescribed high-risk antibiotics are at higher risk for serious bleeding events. Early INR evaluation may mitigate this risk. 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

A study was designed to compare the systemic absorption of metronidazole by the oral and vaginal routes. Nine subjects received single 500-mg doses of the oral, vaginal insert, and vaginal cream preparations on three occasions. Approximately 20% bioavailability was demonstrated from both vaginal forms. Mean peak plasma concentrations were 15.56 micrograms/mL for the oral form, 1.86 micrograms/mL for the cream, and 1.89 micrograms/mL for the insert. The mean times to peak concentration were 1.23 hours for the oral dose and 11.11 hours and 20.11 hours for the cream and insert, respectively. The data demonstrate that some vaginal absorption occurs from both the cream and insert preparations of metronidazole

Because of the known interaction of warfarin and disulfiram and the 'disulfiram effect' of metronidazole, the interaction with metronidazole of commercial racemic warfarin and its separated enantiomorphs was evaluated in eight normal subjects. Single oral doses of racemate, S(-)-warfarin, and R (+)-warfarin, were administered in the amounts of 1.5, 0.75 and 1.5 mg per kilogram of body weight, respectively, with and without metronidazole, 750 mg by mouth, beginning seven days before the warfarin dose and continuing seven days before the warfarin dose and continuing daily throughout the hypoprothrombinemia. Daily plasma samples were analyzed for warfarin in content and one-stage prothrombin time. A highly significant (P less than 0.01) augmentation of the mean warfarin level and hypoprothrombinemia with metronidazole occurred for racemic and S (-)- warfarin; none occurred with R (+)-warfarin. Thus, the interaction of racemic warfarin and metronidazole is stereoselective and can be lessened or even avoided by use of R (+)-warfarin alone for long-term therapy