PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine whether vigabatrin affects in vivo indices of hepatic microsomal enzyme activity and the pharmacokinetics of steroid oral contraceptives in healthy subjects. METHODS: Under double-blind conditions, 13 female healthy volunteers received, in random order and with a washout interval of > or = 4 weeks, two oral 4-week treatments with vigabatrin (VGB) (maintenance dosage, 3,000 mg daily) and placebo, respectively. The clearance and half-life of antipyrine (a broad marker of drug oxidation capacity), the urinary excretion of 6-beta-hydroxycortisol (a selective marker of cytochrome CYP3A-mediated oxidation), and the activity of serum gamma- glutamyltransferase (a nonspecific index of microsomal enzyme activity) were determined after 3 weeks of each treatment. The single-dose kinetics of a combined oral contraceptive containing 30 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 150 micrograms levonorgestrel were also determined after 3 weeks of treatment by specific radioimmunologic assays. RESULTS: VGB treatment had no influence on antipyrine clearance (28 +/- 5.6 vs. 30 +/- 4.5 ml/h/kg on placebo), antipyrine half-life (15.5 +/- 3.5 vs. 14.1 +/- 2.1 h), urinary 6-beta-hydroxycortisol excretion (488 +/- 164 vs. 470 +/- 228 nmol/ day), 6-beta- hydroxycortisol-to-cortisol concentration ratio (6.8 +/- 3.1 vs. 6.1 +/- 3.1) and serum gamma-glutamyltransferase activity (12 +/- 3 vs. 11 +/- 3 IU/L). No difference in pharmacokinetic parameters between VGB and placebo sessions were found for ethinyl estradiol (half-life, 12.5 +/- 3.2 vs. 13.9 +/- 3.2 h; AUC, 874 +/- 301 vs. 939 +/- 272 ng/ L/h) and levonorgestrel (half-life, 17.7 +/- 5.2 vs. 23.1 +/- 9.8 h; AUC, 27.5 +/- 9.6 vs. 30.0 +/- 12.0 micrograms/L/h). Two subjects, however, showed a 50 and a 39% reduction in ethinyl estradiol AUC during VGB treatment. CONCLUSIONS: At therapeutic dosages, VGB did not modify in vivo indices of hepatic microsomal enzyme activity and did not interfere significantly with the CYP3A-mediated metabolism of ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel. Based on these data, VGB is unlikely to affect consistently the efficacy of steroid oral contraceptives or interact pharmacokinetically with drugs that are eliminated mainly by oxidative pathways, particularly those involving cytochrome CYP3A

OBJECTIVE: To describe the primary types of antiepileptic drug (AED) interactions by using a mechanistic approach. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE and bibliographies of recent review articles and published abstracts. DISCUSSION: AEDs are associated with a wide range of drug interactions, including hepatic enzyme induction and inhibition and protein-binding displacement. Hepatic induction by AEDs affects the metabolism of a limited number of drugs with low therapeutic indices. Anticipation of induction interactions and careful clinical monitoring may alleviate potential problems. Most commonly used AEDs are eliminated through hepatic metabolism catalyzed by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes. Phenytoin, phenobarbital, and carbamazepine induce CYP and UGT enzymes. Lamotrigine is a weak inducer of UGT. Valproate is a broad-spectrum inhibitor of UGT enzymes, epoxide hydrolase, and CYP2C enzymes. Felbamate induces CYP3A4, but inhibits CYP2C19 substrates. Topiramate inhibits only CYP2C19 substrates. Ethosuximide, gabapentin, tiagabine, and vigabatrin are neither inducers nor inhibitors of drug metabolism. Hepatic enzyme inhibition usually occurs because of competition at the enzyme site. Knowledge of the specific metabolic enzymes involved in the metabolism of AEDs allows clinicians to predict potential interactions. CONCLUSIONS: By understanding the mechanisms of drug interactions, the pharmacist can play a key role in patient care by anticipating and preventing AED drug interactions

Summary: Generally, the efficacy of an anticonvulsant drug is a function of the intensity of the seizure process and the drug concentration in plasma and tissues. Because of the variability of the seizure process among individuals, a universally effective drug plasma level is not to be expected. Rather a 'desirable' plasma level range for each drug can be defined, the lower limits being those levels above which the majority of patients are well controlled, the upper limits being determined by the onset of drug intoxication. With the onset of administration of anticonvulsants in average doses, the maximum plasma levels and effect are reached only after several days or with some drugs, after several weeks of therapy. The lag time can be reduced with loading doses in the case of phenytoin or phenobarbitone (2 to 3 times the usual dose). For maintenance therapy phenytoin and phenobarbitone may be given in a single daily dose without marked fluctuations in the plasma levels. Some variations in the plasma levels relative to particular doses do occur, but in the majority of patients predictable ranges of plasma levels relative to doses can be defined. Marked deviations from these expected ranges are however, not infrequent. Low levels are most frequently caused by patients' failure to take the drug regularly. Rare causes for low plasma levels are malabsorption of the drug, or unusually rapid drug metabolism or elimination. High levels may be caused by ingestion of greater than the prescribed dose, by impaired drug metabolism or elimination (genetic or constitutional), or because of interactions with other drugs. Elevation of phenytoin plasma level to the toxic range has been caused by a number of drugs, most predictably with disulfiram, sulthiame and isoniazid. When the interfering drug cannot be discontinued, the phenytoin dosage must be reduced and a new dose titrated using the plasma level as the indicator. In the treatment of petit mal, the order of preference of drugs is based on efficacy and safety, with ethosuximide the drug of choice, followed in order by trimethadione, para-methadione, methsuximide and phensuximide. In grand mal and focal epilepsies, phenytoin and phenobarbitone are the best understood and successful drugs. Primidone is also very effective. Carbamazepine can be used as an alternative. A number of other agents are available for use in combination with the prime drugs in highly refractory cases, or alone when the major drugs are contra-indicated. ACTH, or if this fails, diazepam or nitrazepam, can be used to abolish seizures in infantile spasms. Diazepam is the drug of choice in status epilepticus; given intravenously in status grand mal, or intramuscularly or intravenously in status petit mal and status focal seizures. Adverse effects of anticonvulsants can be divided into three groups: those which are a result of intoxication and which are related to elevated plasma levels. These include nystagmus, sedation and unsteadiness, and are usually, but not inevitably, a consequence of overdosage. The second category includes the side-effects, which occur as by-products of the pharmacological action of the drugs when used in the usual doses and with plasma levels in the desirable range. They may be more severe with higher doses. Frequent among these are gum hypertrophy with phenytoin, photophobia with trimethadione and depression of folate with hydantoins and barbiturates. Idiosyncratic reactions comprise the third category of unwanted effects; these are unpredictable, are unrelated to dose or plasma level and presumably occur on an allergic basis. Most frequent are skin rashes, and most dangerous are blood dyscrasias. The dysmorphogenic effects, the effects on the pregnant mother and on the newborn are reviewed.

Over 700 alleged OC/drug interactions were reported for antituberculous drugs, other antibiotics, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and analgesics. Fewer than ten reports of OC/drug interactions were found involving antihistamines, thyroid hormone, vitamin C, antacids, ulcer medication, or diuretics. These may represent a set of OC/drug interaction problems that need to brought into medical awareness. Pregnancy is the first event reported when OCs appear to interact with another drug. However, menstrual disturbances are reported more often. BTB is the most frequently reported menstrual disturbance: it has been considered a warning signal that OC efficacy may be compromised. In such circumstances, contraceptive backup may be warranted. Reports of interference with OC efficacy have been most common for drugs used to treat tuberculosis, epilepsy, and depression, so patients and their physicians should be aware of potential problems. However, the average woman is more likely to encounter antibiotics, analgesics, and antihistamines, and current package inserts contain appropriate warnings. In recent years, prescriptions for low-estrogen OCs have outnumbered those for high-dose preparations. Many physicians became concerned that there was an increased risk of OC drug failure with the low-dose products. The database does not seem to suggest that this has happened. The dose of estrogen is not correlated with total adverse experience reports, time of appearances of the first adverse experience reports, or rate of reporting of the interactions. Likewise, reports of potential interactions with menstrual disturbances are not correlated with lower estrogen doses in OCs. There is, however, an association between low-estrogen OCs and recently reported pregnancies attributed to OC/drug interactions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Levonorgestrel implants (Norplant) are an alternative to oral contraceptives and medroxyprogesterone acetate intramuscular injections. An interaction may exist between levonorgestrel and agents that induce the hepatic microsomal enzyme system. A 21-year-old woman with a history of a seizure disorder, treated with phenobarbital, who received levonorgestrel implants became pregnant. After a normal delivery, she took oral contraceptives concomitantly with phenobarbital. Although she was educated about the importance of a backup method of contraception, the woman again became pregnant and delivered twins. A recent national survey of neurologists and obstetricians was conducted evaluating prescriber knowledge of interactions between oral contraceptives and anticonvulsants. Only 4% of neurologists and zero percent of obstetricians knew all the interactions between the six most commonly prescribed anticonvulsants and oral contraceptives. This case supports the importance of continued patient and prescriber education regarding the possibility of drug-drug interactions in women taking anticonvulsants and hormonal contraceptives

In a group of 5 women on long-term anticonvulsant and oral contraceptive therapy, the plasma ethynylestradiol (EE) concentration on 50 microgram EE daily was 11.1 +/- 4.5 pg/ml. These values were at the lower end of the range found in normal women in this laboratory taking 30 microgram EE daily (6-190 pg/ml). Four women have been studied prospectively for 3 months, over 1 cycle before and 2 cycles during phenobarbital 30 mg b.i.d. therapy. Significant falls in the plasma EE concentration were seen in two women (from 104.8 +/- 13.4 to 37.7 +/- 2.0 pg/ml and from 125.6 +/- 23.8 to 34.8 +/- 6.7 pg/ml p less than 0.01) and breakthrough bleeding was seen in both women. No changes in plasma concentrations of follicle stimulating hormone, progesterone, norethindrone or norgestrel were seen. There was a significant increase in the sex hormone binding globulin capacity from 100.7 +/- 5.8 to 133.3 +/- 1.2 nmoles/1 (p less than 0.05). These changes are consistent with the known microsomal enzyme inducing effect of phenobarbital

Oral contraceptives have not been associated with exacerbation of epilepsy despite warnings in package inserts. No clinical study has provided scientific evidence of worsening of seizures in epileptic women who use oral contraceptives, and improvement in seizure control has occurred in some cases. The main concern about use of oral contraceptives in this population is their effectiveness in preventing conception. Failure rates are higher in groups of women taking enzyme- inducing antiepileptic drugs. The degree of increased metabolism of estrogen and progestin components is highly variable and unpredictable among individuals. Use of higher doses increases protection against conception but also increases the risk of side effects, particularly in patients in whom no enzyme induction occurs. The strength of hormones in the pill should be selected individually when initiating use. Some women may require higher doses for full contraceptive effect